The Don Knotts Presidency

August 11th, 2011

Remember Barney Fife?  The lovable, affable (albiet slightly nervous) deputy to Andy Griffith in the fictional town of Mayberry?  “The Andy Griffith Show” was a television staple of the 1960’s and represented a certain innocence that was quintessentially small town America.  There were no looting hoodlums or gangs, no terrorists and no real need for leadership from the sheriff, the mayor or the city council.  Mayberry seemed to just chug right along.  The biggest problem deputy Barney Fife (portrayed by the late great Don Knotts) had to deal with was a vehicle illegally parked in front of Floyd’s Barbershop, or Otis the town drunk’s inability to let himself voluntarily into the cell at the police station because someone neglected to hang the key in its usual spot.

Knott’s character was nervous, almost always caught off guard by even the most predictable of circumstances and about as clumsy as humanly conceivable. Barney carried a gun with an empty chamber, but did keep a single bullet on his belt just in case.  He crashed the squad car, misplaced bail money and even managed to misunderstand a call to the station form a concerned citizen informing him that a person named Martin was coming to town.  When Barney misunderstood “Martin” for “Martians,” you can imagine the comic premise and general anxiety this caused.  Barney Fife was about as prepared to deal with enforcing the law in Mayberry as Barack Obama seems to be in leading this country.

Consider the pratfalls of the Obama presidency: When he took office promising “Hope and Change” unemployment was climbing to nearly 7.6%.  The new sheriff made fast work of that, claiming he would create jobs.  Today the jobless rate stands at over 9%.  The Community Organizer in Chief said taxes would not be raised on a single American (except for the wealthiest 2%)  Turns out that the wealthiest 2% are largely small businesses, LLC’s and the folks who employ real people in the private sector.  It’s actually funny to hear the President continue to refer to these folks as “private jet owners”.

Spending has been a problem and to be fair, President Bush deserves his share of blame for increasing government spending.  But Obama came to Mayberry and “Fifed” the debt to to nearly 95% of our GDP.  The next foible was a trillion dollar spending plan that would create “shovel ready” jobs which flopped so incredibly that the President’s party was summarily thrown out of office in the 2010 mid term elections to allow Republicans a clear majority in the house and near majority in the senate.  Conflicts continue to rage overseas, Guantanamo is still open for business, and the debt ceiling debacle has earned the president the distinction of being the first president in the history of the republic to preside over a downgrade in America’s credit rating.  The Chinese hold us hostage by manipulating their currency and killing domestic manufacturing. Violence has broken out across Europe. This guy is making many Americans yearn for the “salad days” of Herbert Hoover!

Alas, all is not well in Mayberry.  The President’s failure to lead, his inability to grasp the concept of capitalism and entrepreneurship as a fundamentally “American” means toward a successful and healthy economy are clumsy examples of his Don Knotts behavior. This President, like Barney Fife, is patently unprepared and unable to lead.  His failure to lead would be funny, like deputy Fife’s inability to truly maintain law and order in bucolic Mayberry -unfortunately we’re not in Mayberry!

The President appears clueless, unprepared, inept and more than a little bit nervous at a time when real leadership is needed more than ever.  Instead of offering solutions; he storms out of meetings with Congressional leadership in a snit.  Instead of presenting real ideas for job creation and debt reduction he says “everything’s on the table.” Instead of offering his own ideas, he whines at press conferences for the partisan bickering in Washington to stop.  Instead of stepping forward, calling the Congress back to Washington to settle this mess, he’s packing for his annual vacation to Fantasy Island (aka Martha’s Vineyard) to wring his hands  with the like minded anti-capitalists and “beautiful people” that inhabit Oak Bluffs and Edgartown.

The difference between President Obama and Barney Fife is this: when it came to a crisis at least Barney had a gun and a bullet if he needed it. He was at least somewhat prepared.  The president has nothing. Nada. Zero. Zilch. Crickets. And there’s nothing funny about that!

Mired in The Muck

July 28th, 2011

I am a proud Republican.  I am also someone who believes like most Americans that the process of  legislative democracy is not easy or pretty  It is indeed, as someone once said, akin to making sausage.  Most people like the way the stuff tastes, but if you watched them make it, you might quickly lose your appetite for a lumber jack breakfast.

So here we are in the midst of a Washington stalemate with regard to raising the debt ceiling (again) and attempting to deal once and for all with the issues of runaway government spending and deficits that most thinking people believe can not be sustained.  This not-so-pretty process has been paraded before the American people and the world as a passion play of political ideology in which both sides have painted themselves into a corner.

The House is expected to vote later today on Boehner’s newest revision of Cut, Cap and Balance which would effectively allow the debt ceiling to be raised in two steps provided that commensurate spending cuts are put into place.  There’s a little bit of everything in here for everyone not to like, but at the end of the day it achieves serious spending cuts in the first year, ensures that Congress gets to provide oversight and enforcement on the President and the spend-a-holics on the Democrat side’s abilities to continue to run up our collective debt.  Over the next 10 years spending will be reduced by over $900 billion, which is far better than the status quo and a significant way forward given the political hand the Speaker has been dealt with Republican’s controlling the House, Democrats in control of the Senate and a White House threatening a veto.  In other words the deal Boehner is putting forward for a House vote today is about the best we are going to get given the current environment and political structure of Washington.

Why then are Republicans choosing to eat their young, by turning on the speaker?  This is not just bad public policy and ridiculous politics, it’s just plain stupid.  As Union Leader editorial director Drew Cline tweeted earlier today: “There would be no debt ceiling if there were no debt.”  The reality is that the only way to permanently and more effectively stop deficit spending and stop increasing the debt ceiling is to elect Republican majorities in both Houses, and a Republican President.  If Boehner’s bill fails today, Republicans will have done nothing to advance that objective.  In fact, they will only embolden Obama and the Democrats, and likely make the President’s re-election prospects stronger, by allowing him to point to the GOP as unable or unwilling to accept some compromise to protect a fragile economy and the full faith and credit of the United States. Imagine Barack Obama actually getting out of this without a scratch? He who has come to the table with NO plan, no leadership and exhibited little more than the ability to whine from the bully pulpit on national television – and if some reports of the negotiations are to be believed, threw a hissy fit and walked out of at least one meeting!  This guy is pathetic!  The only thing more pathetic is if the GOP summarily dismisses the best deal we are going to get, at least for now, by turning on their own Speaker and in the process risking the bigger goal which is to make President Obama a one term wonder.

Mired in the muck is not an easy place to be.  John Boehner has done his best to reach a compromise, but the pig headed ideologues in his own party remain completely and totally intransigent. On the other side, Democrats insist on hogging taxes from hard working Americans. Those of us who want a conservative government must remember another old adage: “Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered.”

5 Reasons Sarah Palin Should Not Run

July 18th, 2011

Here is my editorial that appeared in last Friday’s Union Leader.

“Sarah Palin has been making noise again about jumping into the GOP race for the White House, but she needs to think about this decision carefully.  The question she needs to be asking herself is not “can I win?” (she can’t). The real question is, should she ruin the trailer by actually making the movie?

There is nothing worse than a trailer that gives away the entire plot of the film, showing all the best scenes. Palin is a good trailer, but she’s no full length feature, which is what Republicans need in a nominee to deny President Obama a second term. She has already played the main supporting role in a national campaign and that didn’t work out so well for the GOP. Palin is a much better “possible candidate” than actual candidate. By announcing that she is a candidate for president, Sarah Palin loses the one potent thing that makes her relevant: the possibility that she might run.

Here are 5 good reasons “Palin the Perky” should resist the temptation of jumping into a pool of GOP candidates that is still not yet complete:

  1. Palin is limited: While she makes for good copy and assures that Tina Fey’s career remains robust, Palin has shown us her stuff.  She screeches, she’s not all that articulate and she still demonstrates a limited ability to grasp the complexities of the country and the world necessary to be an effective President.  We’ve seen her fast ball, her curve and her slider. Unless she’s holding a pitch we haven’t seen, her range is limited.
  2. Palin’s base has too many choices: Bachman, Paul, Gingrich, Cain and the likely entry of the 12,000 pound gorilla himself, Rick Perry, give social conservatives too many choices, thereby splitting up Palin’s conservative base in early contests.  There is only so much of the base after Iowa, and New Hampshire is an open primary in which Independents will play a big role.  That means the Palin vote gets sliced and diced enough to allow her no significant plurality in important early states. Never mind that the GOP tends to nominate the candidate whose turn it is, and Palin loses that title to Romney this time.
  3. Money: Palin has turned her comical turn as the vice presidential nominee into a lucrative career with the Fox News deal, the best selling book and speaking fees. But running for president is not about making money, it’s about raising money and while her Sarah PAC has raised some money as a conservative support base, she will not be able to compete in raising the kinds of dollars she will need to win the nomination. No money, no message, no media!  This is like playing “Deal or No Deal.” The dealer is offering more speaking fees, the chance to host your own show on Fox, multiple book deals and even the chance to fill in for Rush when he’s on vacation or in rehab.  Take the deal, Sarah!
  4. Sheer unelectability: While Sarah Palin is a great American, she can not win a general election.  She doesn’t play well outside her comfort zone. The nominee must be able to hold the base and attract disenfranchised Independents prepared to step away from President Obama’s failed leadership on jobs and the economy.  Sarah Palin is an easy caricature for the Democrats and- no matter how unpopular and vulnerable Barack Obama may be – does not attract independent voters.  To attract those folks, she would need to step away from the very fringe that makes her so attractive to the right of the Republican Party.  Electability rarely trumps political ideology in a presidential primary, but this time Republicans MUST win.  There is too much at stake.
  5. Campaigns are hard work!  Sarah Palin knows well how uncomfortable a national campaign can be.  Bad hotels, long periods away from home, grueling schedules, drive-thru food and of course, having to patiently entertain questions from all those Iowa and New Hampshire voters.  Then there’s the mean old press: some smart aleck reporter might even have the unmitigated gall to ask her what she reads!

Governor Palin has made up her mind. Only the governor and her family know her plans.  Let us hope for the sake of the republic and for the chance of a credible GOP nominee that she looks into the dark, cold water and decides it’s much more comfortable to sit this one out poolside.”

Mubarak’s reign cut short by digital democracy

February 7th, 2011

Following the coverage in Egypt this past week has been fascinating on so many levels.  Here is a developed country – one of our “allies” in the Middle East – which has put up with a tinhorn despot for more than 30 years.  “Oh we have free and fair elections, but Hosni just always happens to win.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Adapt or Die

January 25th, 2011

If you haven’t realized by now, Facebook is a powerful tool that is challenging many traditional advertising media.  This year alone, ad spending on Facebook is expected to reach $4.05 billion and is predicted to increase over 42 percent by 2012.  The trend of online ad spending on Facebook is only expected to increase, causing companies to pull money from their print budgets to compensate for their online spending.  This shift in dollars is a serious concern for the print industry, threatening the survival of even the major newspapers.

The Washington Post seems to have taken the “if you can’t beat them, join them” attitude. This nationally recognized paper, known for its top political news, is embracing and adapting to new technology. Even though the Post is 134 years old, it is staying on top of the latest trends. In fact, The Post was one of the first major newspapers to integrate Facebook Connect and has nowlaunched SocialCode, a full-service Facebook marketing and advertising agency specializing in “page management, app development, social commerce, fan monetization, message testing, and advertising through Facebook’s Ads API.”  SocialCode was developed to manage the marketing efforts of The Post along with other brands, and to offset the money being lost by declining print revenue.

It is interesting to see how far Facebook has come since it first launched and how it has directly impacted the advertising industry.  It is crucial that brands adapt to the new opportunities – including Facebook – in order to remain competitive.

Life with the Internet

January 18th, 2011

Remember the days before computers? How did we ever survive?  Today, the Internet is clearly a major part of our lives.  With almost 2 billion Internet users worldwide, it is a resource we use for work, school, communicating, browsing, and researching. The Internet has taken over our lives and we would be beside ourselves if it was ever stripped away from us.  However, when the numbers are put right in front of our faces, it is almost mind boggling as to how much the internet has evolved over even just the past ten years. Below are some interesting statistics regarding the Internet and just how big it has become as of 2010:

Read the rest of this entry »

The Natalie Portman movie that’s giving ballet a bad name

January 10th, 2011

Okay I’ll admit it—I’m not a big fan of ballet. My wife took me once and needless to say I could not wait for intermission.  I know those who are fans of the art of dance will call me uncivilized and unappreciative of the works of the great masters; I plead guilty.  Having said this, the new film, The Black Swan, that’s all aglow with Oscar buzz, may not win Swan Lake a lot of new fans.  The film directed by Darren Aronofsky is a torrid and rather unflattering behind-the-scenes look at Nina Sayers. She is portrayed by an emaciated Natalie Portman as an aspiring prima ballerina who finally gets her big break with The New York Ballet, landing the lead as the Swan Princess in a new production of Swan Lake.  The gig is pretty heady stuff for a young dancer and literally goes to her head quickly—and I don’t mean in a good way.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Evolution of Books

December 10th, 2010

Today, digital is where it’s at.  Banking and shopping have made the leap to digital, so it was only a matter of time before the same was true for books and libraries.  New to the e-book industry is Google who just launched Google E-books. Google’s e-bookstore gives users access to over 3 million books and over 4,000 publishers at an affordable price, if not free.  Unlike many other e-bookstores that are currently available, Google’s E-books are compatible and can simultaneously sync up with numerous electronic devices including computers, e-readers, smartphones and iPads.  This is possible because the e-books are not technically downloaded, instead, they are stored “in the cloud,” which makes them accessible to read any time, anywhere and no matter how much memory your device has.

Read the rest of this entry »

Do Not Disturb!

December 3rd, 2010

We’re all familiar with the telemarketers that like to disturb us over dinner regarding topics that range from political messages to credit card surveys.  I’m sure some of you have, or know someone that has, demanded to be put on the do not call list.  And, by law, the company is required to do so.  A similar concept is now being applied to the web.

Recently the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a proposal to enable a “do not track” option for Internet users.  This proposal is in favor of consumer privacy; however, it could have a damaging impact on the advertising industry. While do not call lists prevent companies from reaching consumers by phone, they have other ways to reach consumers that are just as effective.  On the other hand, with online advertising being one of the preferred mediums to reach consumers today, there is certainly some serious cause for concern if a do not track option is implemented.  In fact, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau, for the first half of this year, online advertising brought in a little more than $12.1 billion.

Currently, advertisers analyze online data including everything from websites visited, links clicked, and browsing history to purchases, geographical location, and personal info gathered on social media sites.  With this data, advertisers are able to better define target markets and send them specific ads that are more relevant to their interests and needs.  Not bombarding consumers with ads that are less relevant to them will  make them less irritated, but will also improve sales for companies.  The “Do Not Track” proposal would give consumers the option to choose whether or not advertisers could review data collected about them or track them at all.  If there is widespread adoption of this option, the advertising industry will suffer, meaning that advertisers will have a more difficult time gathering the consumer data that is crucial in sending messages that are as targeted as possible.